Sustainable Eco comparison between the inverted pouch and glass bottle

Eco Impact, estimate the environmental footprint, sustainability of STANDCAP Pouches, inverted squeeze pouches, natural resource utilization
Source: Uncle Dougie

Inverted pouches considerably diminish Eco Impact compared to Glass Bottles. The Natural Marketing Institute (NMI) to estimate the environmental footprint and sustainability of STANDCAP Pouches (inverted pouches) versus glass bottles.

The outcomes of this study show that inverted pouches:
  • Decrease fossil fuel usage by 65%
  • Decrease greenhouse emissions by 77.8%
  • Decrease overall water usage by 80.6%
  • Decrease in packaging weight by 90%
“It’s necessary to make an impression where we can, and our fans expect us to do so. This case is a huge upgrade for convenience and usability, and shows you can bring meaningful innovation to customers and do ideal for the planet at the same time.”
While the inverted squeeze pouches are recyclable, the packaging is far more sustainable than glass due to its significantly lower carbon footprint and natural resource utilization. Recyclable, flexible food-grade plastic has developed. One of the best things about inverted pouches is not fragile, like glass bottles.
Many companies did consider recyclability, but glass recycling is becoming more and more difficult for consumers, and in a lot of cases, it’s worse for natural resource consumption. “Examining the sustainability practices from a holistic standpoint enables us to make smart decisions that will more significantly decrease our carbon footprint and do better to leave the world a better place than we found it.”
Now, the market is floating to sustainable, eco-friendly, and recyclable options. So, all these features available in the inverted pouches.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here